Thursday, March 31, 2011

Jackie Chan Dead? Not So Fast

Jackie Chan wants to set the record straight: Contrary to Internet rumors, he is, in fact, not dead.

"Jackie is alive and well," reads a note on the action star's Facebook page. "He did not suffer a heart attack and die, as was reported on many social networking sites and in online news reports."

Chan, 56, is working hard, however, continues the missive: "Jackie is fine and is busy preparing for the filming of his next movie."

Still not convinced? For those who require proof, Chan posted a photo of himself dated March 29 on his Web site showing him meeting with top Japanese officials.

The caption reads in part, "Jackie met with Yuji Kumamaru, Consul-General of Japan in Hong Kong to discuss the details of the 'Love Without Borders 3/11 Candelight Gala,' " which will benefit the victims of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan.

Chan is in good company, joining a handful of celebrities – including Charlie Sheen – who have been the victims of online celebrity death hoaxes.

By Sara Hammel
Sources: people.com

'House' star Olivia Wilde files for divorce

Olivia Wilde is done playing "House" and ready to go, well, wild.

The "Tron: Legacy" star has filed for divorce from her Italian prince of a husband, Tao Ruspoli, after eight years of marriage, citing irreconcilable differences.

So where does Ryan Gosling factor in?

The 27-year-old actress and Ruspoli, a Los Angeles-based documentary filmmaker and flamenco guitarist who's also the son of an Italian aristocrat, met when Wilde was just 18. After a whirlwind courtship, they eloped in January 2003, tying the knot in an abandoned school bus with only two witnesses.

In recent times, however, the had been living apart and finally announced their split last month. They have no children.

Now that she's royalty-free, Wilde was just spotted getting cozy with Ryan Gosling last week. No word on whether they're really an item or "just friends."

Workwise, Wilde is currently filming "Blackbird," costarring with Erica Bana as a brother and sister on the lam.

Emma Watson Taking a Break From School to Focus on Career

Emma Watson is trading in Brown University for Hogwarts – for now, anyway.

The actress-student, 20, announced on her Web site Monday that she will be dialing back on her schoolwork to focus on her career.

"As you know, I love Brown and I love studying pretty much more than anything," she wrote. "But recently I've had so much to juggle that being a student AND fulfilling my other commitments has become a little impossible."

The Harry Potter star, a sophomore at the Ivy League school, added that she wants more time to focus on the film franchise's last installment.

"I've decided to take a bit of time off to completely finish my work on Harry Potter (the last one comes out this summer) and to focus on my other professional and acting projects," she continued. "I will still be working towards my degree … it's just going to take me a semester or two longer than I thought : )."

She signs off, "Hope you are all well! Thank you for all your continuing support.
Emma xx."

Source: people.com

Green Lantern - Ryan Reynolds



For Ryan Reynolds, the most professionally satisfying moment of 2009 was the first time he saw the Green Lantern costume he'd be rocking for the upcoming big-screen adaptation of the classic DC Comics superhero.

"It was a moment when I was like, 'This is happening, and it's happening in the right way,' " Reynolds told MTV News last fall. "That's a pretty cool, definitive moment for me."

Now the rest of us are getting a chance to see the costume that blew Reynolds' mind. Entertainment Weekly has debuted a first look at the Green Lantern — and his test-pilot alter ego, Hal Jordan — who will be gracing multiplexes in the summer of 2011. The cover image shows Reynolds in familiar Lantern garb, complete with green mask, glowing green suit and iconic power ring, which can bring into existence nearly anything Hal can imagine.

"Will and imagination are his superpowers," said Reynolds, who reportedly injured his shoulder on the "Green Lantern" set earlier this week. "We need a circus of Timothy Learys to think of things Hal would invent with his ring."

Though experienced in the action movie realm, from "Blade: Trinity" to "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," Reynolds confessed that nothing could prepare him for the wire-work involved in the "Green Lantern" shoot, which required him to fly through the air at up to 60 feet per second to simulate the illusion of real flight.

"The first time you do it, you're seriously considering an adult diaper," Reynolds said.

Directed by Martin Campbell ("Casino Royale") and co-starring Tim Robbins, Blake Lively, Mark Strong and Peter Sarsgaard, the movie is set to hit theaters on June 17, 2011. In MTV News' earlier conversation with Reynolds, he heaped praise on Campbell's vision for the film.

"When you have a guy like Martin Campbell, part of his charm is that he has ba--s of titanium, and the other part is that he's slightly crazy, and you have to be to take on something with the scope of 'Green Lantern,' " he said. "I sat down with him, and I could not even believe what he was saying. When I went to the meeting, I was entirely cynical. I thought, 'What the hell, I'll see what they have to say,' and I left the room with a completely different perspective."

Source: mtv.com

FD5

Isn’t it strange how a series about not being able to escape death has managed to escape death for so long? Final Destination is one of my favourite film franchises and I got what people meant when they criticised the acting, that is until I saw The Final Destination (Final Destination 4). The 3D was great, but the rest of it didn’t exactly inspire confidence in the future of the saga. Yet here it is a fifth instalment of, what is now, the most hypocritical film series ever.

The plot is the same as usual; someone has a vision of a disaster, and then saves themselves and some expendable extras. This time the disaster is a bridge collapsing, which so does not beat the rollercoaster in number 3. Sam Lawton, played by Nicholas D’Agosto, is the lucky character that has a random premonition.

It’s never exactly been revealed why they get visions, though it two possibilities have been hinted at. One possibility is that a rival force is trying to help people by given them the visions. The other theory is that death has sent the premonitions as a way to guide them into his plans; this means they never avoided death in the first place. One major whole in the second option is that, if it were true, the second movie would make no sense as death goes backwards through the list to seal up the rift made by the survivors of the first one.

William Bludworth, played by Tony Todd, will finally be making another appearance, having not been seen since Final Destination 2. His character is the, seemingly, all knowing mortician who once told the characters how to save themselves once and for all. They failed. So far there are no survivors. Clear Rivers got pretty far, managing to last almost two movies, but she was ultimately killed proving that blonds can screw up simple tasks like opening doors.

The movie is expected to hit cinemas on the 26th of August. Like its predecessor it will be in 3D. I wonder if Final Destination will ever actually reach its final destination, if sales go well they intend to make Final Destination six and seven. These would be films back to back, which hints that there would be some relevant continuity between them. Let’s hope that they find some way to spice up the fleeting franchise before the completely run it into the ground.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 is the most-anticipated movie of 2011 among both men and women, according to a Fandango.com poll of over 1,000 people conducted over the Christmas holiday, reports Reuters. The final film in the Harry Potter franchise is due July 15.

Second choice with theatergoers was divided by gender, with women preferring The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1, due Nov. 18, and men anticipating the comedy sequel The Hangover Part 2, which lands in theaters on May 26.

Other notables mentioned in the poll are Black Swan's Natalie Portman, who was named by male voters as cinema's sexiest actress, while women cast their vote for bilingual big screen siren Penelope Cruz. Angelina Jolie landed in second place with both sexes.

Jolie's The Tourist co-star Johnny Depp was voted the No. 1 sexiest man in movies among men and women. Following close behind as the male respondents' choice leading man is Ryan Reynolds, while women went with Robert Downey, Jr.

Red Riding Hood Review

Director Catherine Hardwicke has been ousted from the franchise after the first Twilight movie and it seems she is still bitter about it. The weekend edition of Red Riding Hood, with wide-eyed stars Amanda Seyfried and the venerable Gary Oldman is too strong a resemblance to vampires and werewolves film to be ignored. While the franchise Twilight (love or hate it) is committed to the minds and hearts of teenage girls all over the world, Red Riding Hood is not even an epic failure. No, it’s just disappointment. What should have been soaring, ambitious story ends up feeling artificial, rigid and boring.

Red Riding Hood follows pretty Valerie (Seyfried), a resident of medieval village Daggerhorn (we never find out where the village is but it doesn’t really matter), as she strives to decide between two honorable young men, bad boy Peter (Shiloh Fernandez) and wealthy Henry (Max Irons). Unlike Bella Swan, Valerie isn’t just a clumsy girl; she killed a rabbit when she was a little girl, and that makes her hard, you see. A werewolf stalks Daggerhorn by the light of the full moon, accepting sacrificial livestock and terrifying the townspeople. When the wolf murders Valerie’s sister Lucy, town priest, Father Auguste (Lukas Haas), sends for hardened werewolf-killer Father Solomon (Oldman) to best the creature. Commence the whodunit aspect of the film: is the wolf mysterious Grandmother (Julie Christie), or bitter friend Prudence (Kacey Rohl)? It could be anyone—and the movie’s one saving grace is that you probably won’t expect the outcome.

Hardwicke specializes in sweeping shots of beautiful scenery, and the opening sequence of Red Riding Hood emphasizes this. Beyond that we see very little of the setting; the movie is softly lit and halos surround our main characters. Cinematographer Mandy Walker produced some pretty tracking shots, but the dynamic camera is dizzying at times, its constant movement an obvious ploy to keep us involved despite a waning plot. Though production designer Thomas E. Sanders assembled a convincing medieval village, all solid wooden points and wrought iron bars, the film looks manufactured due to patently artificial lighting, brightly colored (and immaculate) costumes, and snow that doesn’t melt upon contact with human skin. All this could serve the fantastical element of the material—Little Red Riding Hood is of course a fairy tale—but it ends up feeling forced.

Screenwriter David Johnson, whose one prior writing credit was the hilariously mind-boggling Orphan (2009), penned a script that’s as stilted as it is ridiculous. Characters are so superficial as to be entirely unbelievable, and modern dialogue just doesn’t fit the setting. Lines like “I must be God, because you’re the Devil!” are just plain trite—and sometimes baffling. The last movie to strive for modern-day depictions of sexuality, utilize contemporary speech patterns, and underscore a medieval celebration with pop music was A Knight’s Tale—and it didn’t turn out so well. (Here’s hoping Your Highness manages this better.)

Hardwicke may be trying to bank on the success of the franchise she began making; according to IMDb, shirtless heartthrob Taylor Lautner was considered for the role of Peter, and Billy Burke, who’s by far the best part of the Twilight flicks, plays Valerie’s father. Further, the first Twilight movie didn’t yet deal with werewolves (or shapeshifters, for you Twi-hards who might be reading), but it introduced a story that would become about a weak, obnoxious female protagonist waffling over two boys who loathe each other but inexplicably love her so very much. All of this material is present in Red Riding Hood, plus some. Max Irons, offspring of silky-voiced Brit Jeremy Irons, has no discernable personality, and Fernandez may be yet another Robert Pattinson—someone Hardwicke fell in love with during auditions because of his blasé attitude. Poor Oldman, who hasn’t taken a good leading role in years, seems to scoop up whatever’s thrown at him these days; the man is undeniably a brilliant actor, but even he phones it in as the ostensibly evil Father Solomon. Finally, Seyfried, who was lovable in Mean Girls and good on “Big Love,” appears bored out of her mind throughout the film.

Despite a great supporting cast including Christie, Oldman, Virginia Madsen, and Michael Hogan (known to “Battlestar Galactica” fans as Saul Tighe), the movie falls short by a long shot. Red Riding Hood’s source material is a truly creepy folk tale with which every schoolchild is familiar, its setting apparently lovely and fantastic. It boasts a good cast and a talented director (Hardwicke, remember, gave us the great indie Thirteen). Somehow, the flick that should have been an epic ends up being epically boring. Perhaps this is why Summit decided Hardwicke wasn’t right for Twilight; Hardwicke’s seminal film has a distinctly small-scale feel compared to New Moon and Eclipse. The best part of Red Riding Hood is the trailers—in some theaters you’ll see a brand new (and awesome) trailer for J.J. Abrams’ secretive-til-now Super 8, a new preview for Wes Craven’s Scream 4, and another for the Zack Snyder vehicle Sucker Punch. Hopefully the next few months will bring us out of the springtime doldrums and into some new and satisfying material.